Livoa LogoLivoa
Table 2.1: Summary of Literature Reviews
Sl. No


Article Title, Published year, Journal name

Methods / Concept / Approach

Key Features / Key Findings

Merits

Demerits / Identified Gaps

1


Sharma et al., 2019, Legal Tech

Workflow automation in legal Xdocumentation

35% reduction in service time

Demonstrates efficiency gains

Lack of incentives for providers

2


Kumar & Iyer, 2020, Healthcare Marketplaces

Trust, ratings, transparency

Ratings improved user engagement

Insights applicable to legal services marketplace

Weak incentive schemes for providers

3


Mihale-Wilson, 2024, Incentive Systems

Orchestrating incentives in digital ecosystems

Identified key participation factors

Directly informs incentive design in legal platforms

Need for context-specific mechanisms

4


Ruutu, 2017, Platform Development

System dynamics modeling of platform evolution

Impact of governance on competition

Provides insights into platform competition dynamics

Lack of regulatory frameworks

5


Mökander, 2023, AI Auditing

Legal, ethical, and technical auditing frameworks

Established auditing principles

Essential for ensuring AI accountability in legal services

Need for standardized processes

6


Rodrigues, 2020, AI and Human Rights

Legal implications of AI

Identified gaps in legal frameworks

Crucial for understanding AI's legal landscape

Absence of comprehensive standards

7


Spychiger, 2022, Data Quality Incentives

Blockchain-based rating mechanisms

Effectiveness in improving data quality

Offers model for incentivizing quality contributions

Limited application scope

8


Greenstein, 2022, AI and Rule of Law

Impact of AI on legal principles

Challenges to transparency and fairness

Provides critical perspective on AI's role in governance

Need for alignment with rule of law

9


Karnouskos, 2022, Law, Robots, and Society

Interplay of law and robotics

Explored societal implications

Offers insights into law and technology relationship

Need for legal frameworks for robotics

10


Eckardt, 2024, EU Digital Law

Co-evolution of law and technology

Identified drivers of legal evolution

Informs understanding of regulatory approaches to digital platforms

Need for empirical analysis

Table 2.1: Summary of Literature Reviews
Sl. No
Article Title, Published year, Journal name
Methods / Concept / Approach
Key Features / Key Findings
Merits
Demerits / Identified Gaps
1
Sharma et al., 2019, Legal Tech
Workflow automation in legal Xdocumentation
35% reduction in service time
Demonstrates efficiency gains
Lack of incentives for providers
2
Kumar & Iyer, 2020, Healthcare Marketplaces
Trust, ratings, transparency
Ratings improved user engagement
Insights applicable to legal services marketplace
Weak incentive schemes for providers
3
Mihale-Wilson, 2024, Incentive Systems
Orchestrating incentives in digital ecosystems
Identified key participation factors
Directly informs incentive design in legal platforms
Need for context-specific mechanisms
4
Ruutu, 2017, Platform Development
System dynamics modeling of platform evolution
Impact of governance on competition
Provides insights into platform competition dynamics
Lack of regulatory frameworks
5
Mökander, 2023, AI Auditing
Legal, ethical, and technical auditing frameworks
Established auditing principles
Essential for ensuring AI accountability in legal services
Need for standardized processes
6
Rodrigues, 2020, AI and Human Rights
Legal implications of AI
Identified gaps in legal frameworks
Crucial for understanding AI's legal landscape
Absence of comprehensive standards
7
Spychiger, 2022, Data Quality Incentives
Blockchain-based rating mechanisms
Effectiveness in improving data quality
Offers model for incentivizing quality contributions
Limited application scope
8
Greenstein, 2022, AI and Rule of Law
Impact of AI on legal principles
Challenges to transparency and fairness
Provides critical perspective on AI's role in governance
Need for alignment with rule of law
9
Karnouskos, 2022, Law, Robots, and Society
Interplay of law and robotics
Explored societal implications
Offers insights into law and technology relationship
Need for legal frameworks for robotics
10
Eckardt, 2024, EU Digital Law
Co-evolution of law and technology
Identified drivers of legal evolution
Informs understanding of regulatory approaches to digital platforms
Need for empirical analysis
التوقيت
الأحد
الإثنين
الثلاثاء
الأربعاء
الخميس
08:30 – 10:00
Développement web
محاضرة – د. بوطا عيون
Histoire des médias numériques
محاضرة – د. صحبوري
Introduction à la création numérique
تطبيقية – أ. بوزور
Salle internet (ق3)
Introduction à la création numérique
تطبيقية – أ. بوزور
Salle internet (ق4)
Droit et éthique du numérique
محاضرة
10:00 – 11:30
...................
...................
Production numérique
أ.موجهة – ق1 (بوعبادة)
...................
...................
11:30 – 13:00
...................
Histoire des médias numériques
أ.موجهة – ق4 (دميرة)
Production numérique
أ.موجهة – ق2 (سليح)
Introduction à la création numérique
محاضرة – د. بوالبردعة
Méthodologie d’élaboration des projets
13:00 – 14:30
...................
...................
...................
Méthodes de création numérique
...................

Copy of Project

by Djokovic

0
0 uses